The propensity for Boko Haram’s violence to be motivated by revenge, combined with the probable latent strike capability of the group in other parts of Nigeria and the wider region, could mean that an ‘all-out’ war against Boko Haram would result in terrorist (and other) violence in previously untouched states of Nigeria and countries of the sub-region. This could potentially further destabilize neighbouring countries with existing precarious internal balances, which could potentially worsen security in Nigeria.
“Boko Haram has failed to present a workable alternative to the current system of governance. Furthermore, they have shown a wanton disregard for the lives and property of the very people they claim to want to govern. The real issues are: (1) how long it will take to stop the violence , and (2) how many lives and countries they will be allowed to destroy before they are stopped, for these reasons the strategy chosen to defeat them must be selected carefully” says Adunola Abiola, founder of Think Security Africa (http://www.
Boko Haram’s attacks continue to detract attention and resources away from the socio-political problems in Nigeria that have made the establishment of groups such as Boko Haram possible. Consequently Nigerian and international efforts to end the Boko Haram insurgency must prioritise containment, and pursue concepts of operations designed to protect civilians, boost local force protection, and decrease the ability of Boko Haram to maneuver nationally and regionally. Adopting a retaliatory force posture will likely replicate the outcome of the 2009 crackdown on Boko Haram, where it suffered heavy fatalities, but was still able to regroup and unleash an unprecedented and dispersed campaign of violence against Nigerians.
The Think Security Africa document on National Security in Nigeria is available at: http://thinksecurityafrica.
Distributed by APO (African Press Organization) on behalf of Think Security Africa (TSA).
Yes who funds these guys
the question is who is sponsoring Boko Haram?