Glencore invests in Congo hydropower as solution to blackouts

30 employees of Mopani Copper Mines (MCM) are crowded in the elevator, which will bring 1.5 km below the earth to work in the film SOB copper mine. The Swiss commodities company Glencore's Mopani Copper Mines majority shareholder of and employs approximately 20,000 Zambians.

KINSHASA, Nov 27 (Reuters) – Glencore and its partner in Congoare ploughing $360 million into refurbishing the African nation’s main hydroelectric plant as mining companies seek ways to overcome power shortages that are holding back projects.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Mining investment has poured into Democratic Republic of Congo since 2006, after the 1998-2003 war ended and an election drew a line under decades of dictatorship. Last year, Congo beat out Zambia to become Africa’s main copper producer with output of 914,631 tonnes.

But companies seeking to tap some of the world’s biggest undeveloped mineral reserves say power shortages are preventing development.

Prime Minister Augustin Matata Ponyo told companies in January to halt any expansion plans that require extra power in the southeastern mining heartland of Katanga province.

“If you want to (produce) 1.5 million tonnes of copper, this is only possible if you solve the energy problem,” said Pieter Deboutte, who sits on the board of Mutanda Mining, a copper project owned by Glencore and the Fleurette Group, which is controlled by Israeli billionaire Dan Gertler.

With demand for generation capacity of 912 to 1,202 megawatts, Katanga is facing a deficit of up to 734 MW, according to an August report from national utility company SNEL, seen by Reuters.

Mutanda’s Kamoto mine in Katanga suffered over 862 hours of power interruptions between May and September, according to company figures.

Until now Mutanda has resorted to importing energy from Zambia at up to twice the price of domestic power and using diesel generators that cost $3 million a month.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Glencore and Fleurette have now decided to take matters into their own hands by repairing two turbines at SNEL’s 1,424 MW Inga 2 hydropower plant and upgrading about 2,000 km of transmission lines to take the power to Katanga.

The plan is to produce 450 MW, with 380 MW reserved for Kamoto. Mutanda will recoup the cost through reductions in utility bills, Deboutte said.


“The model here is you bring what you need,” said Oscar Melhado, the International Monetary Fund’s representative in Congo.

Randgold Resources, which poured the first gold at its Kibali mine in Congo’s remote northeast last year, opted for this do-it-yourself strategy from the start.

“We just got on and built our own hydropower stations,” said Mark Bristow, CEO of Randgold, which runs the mine in a joint venture with AngloGold Ashanti and state miner Sokimo. “Without reasonable power costs, Kibali doesn’t make a return.”

Such solutions are within the reach only of the largest players. Others face an uncertain future.

Congo’s hydroelectric potential ranks third behind China’s and Russia’s, according to the World Bank, but underinvestment and mismanagement have left 90 percent of its roughly 65 million people without electricity.

For the long term, the government is counting on a new Inga 3 hydroelectric project with 4,800 MW of capacity. Construction of the dam is set to begin next year and be completed in 2020, according to SNEL.

Some 1,300 MW will be reserved for the mining sector and another 2,500 MW will be sold to South Africa. The remaining 1,000 MW will go to domestic consumption.

An Oxford University study this year of large dam projects found, however, that nearly all of them ran over budget and significantly behind schedule.

“For the more large-scale projects, there’s considerable risk involved,” said Alexander Budzier, a co-author of the study. “We’ve seen that in most cases these risks are underestimated or not fully appreciated.” (Editing by Joe Bavier, Daniel Flynn and Jane Baird)

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});